PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDGE vs. BEDZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HDGE vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HDGE vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
11.86%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%0.65%
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
-6.46%3.46%18.31%23.88%-13.40%6.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than BEDZ's -6.46% return.


HDGE

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.86%
6M
13.54%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
-4.82%
5Y*
-2.70%
10Y*
-14.58%

BEDZ

1D
0.55%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-6.46%
6M
-4.76%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
9.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HDGE vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HDGE vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BEDZ
BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDGE vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDGEBEDZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

0.40

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

0.77

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.10

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

0.69

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.30

1.90

-1.60

HDGE vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDGE and BEDZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDGEBEDZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.40

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

0.22

-0.89

Correlation

The correlation between HDGE and BEDZ is -0.71. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

HDGE vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than BEDZ's 2.47% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.12%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
2.47%2.31%0.00%1.67%0.21%0.36%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HDGE vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and BEDZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGEBEDZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.88%

-29.70%

-64.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.63%

-15.24%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.66%

-9.90%

-82.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.85%

-8.25%

-61.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.54%

5.53%

+8.01%

Volatility

HDGE vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) is 4.49%, while AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that HDGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HDGEBEDZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

6.59%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

15.40%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.95%

25.68%

-5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.95%

24.97%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

24.97%

-1.46%