PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDG vs. HTUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDG vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDG achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, HDG has underperformed HTUS with an annualized return of 3.91%, while HTUS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.


HDG

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.07%
YTD
6.40%
6M
7.00%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
7.56%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
3.91%

HTUS

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.04%
YTD
11.33%
6M
12.04%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDG vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
6.40%7.18%5.12%7.14%-8.48%2.97%7.45%9.58%-4.52%5.59%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
11.33%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%24.29%13.21%20.27%-10.04%14.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HDG and HTUS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015

0.57

Over the past year, HDG and HTUS have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HDG vs. HTUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDG
HTUS

Industrials

17.7%
8.3%

Technology

17.0%
35.6%

Healthcare

16.5%
8.5%

Financial Services

15.8%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.1%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.9%

Energy

6.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.8%

Utilities

2.9%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.9%

Industrials

HDG
17.7%
HTUS
8.3%

Technology

HDG
17.0%
HTUS
35.6%

Healthcare

HDG
16.5%
HTUS
8.5%

Financial Services

HDG
15.8%
HTUS
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HDG
8.4%
HTUS
10.1%

Real Estate

HDG
6.1%
HTUS
1.9%

Energy

HDG
6.1%
HTUS
3.5%

Basic Materials

HDG
4.8%
HTUS
1.8%

Utilities

HDG
2.9%
HTUS
2.4%

Communication Services

HDG
2.4%
HTUS
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

HDG
2.4%
HTUS
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDG vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDG
HDG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDG vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDGHTUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.50

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.35

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

17.27

-3.46

HDG vs. HTUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the HTUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDG and HTUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDGHTUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.81

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.59

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.58

-0.14

Drawdowns

HDG vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDG drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDG and HTUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGHTUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-47.50%

+32.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

-8.68%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.20%

-24.41%

+17.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.31%

-24.41%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.31%

-47.50%

+32.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.55%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-4.06%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.68%

-0.72%

Volatility

HDG vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) is 2.06%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that HDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDGHTUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

2.47%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.58%

9.39%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.64%

11.50%

-5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

19.03%

-11.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

21.45%

-14.34%

HDG vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDG vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

HDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than HTUS's 10.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
2.35%2.55%3.50%3.48%0.39%0.00%0.08%1.09%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.68%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDG and HTUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTUS has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to HDG (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDG dropped -15.31% vs HTUS's -47.50%.

On 10-year performance, HTUS leads with 12.52% vs 3.91% for HDG. On fees, HDG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 2.35% for HDG.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HDG and 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDG and HTUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer