HDG vs. HTUS
HDG (ProShares Hedge Replication) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both Long-Short funds. HDG is passively managed, while HTUS is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDG returned 3.91%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for HTUS. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
HDG vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDG achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, HDG has underperformed HTUS with an annualized return of 3.91%, while HTUS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.
HDG
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
HDG vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDG ProShares Hedge Replication | 6.40% | 7.18% | 5.12% | 7.14% | -8.48% | 2.97% | 7.45% | 9.58% | -4.52% | 5.59% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.33% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 20.27% | -10.04% | 14.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDG and HTUS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, HDG and HTUS have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.
HDG vs. HTUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDG
HTUS
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
HDG
HTUS
Technology
HDG
HTUS
Healthcare
HDG
HTUS
Financial Services
HDG
HTUS
Consumer Cyclical
HDG
HTUS
Real Estate
HDG
HTUS
Energy
HDG
HTUS
Basic Materials
HDG
HTUS
Utilities
HDG
HTUS
Communication Services
HDG
HTUS
Consumer Defensive
HDG
HTUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDG vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
HDG
HTUS
HDG vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDG | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.50 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.35 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 17.27 | -3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDG | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.53 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.81 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.59 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
HDG vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDG drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDG and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDG | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -47.50% | +32.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | -8.68% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.20% | -24.41% | +17.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.31% | -24.41% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -47.50% | +32.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.55% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -4.06% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.68% | -0.72% |
Volatility
HDG vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) is 2.06%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that HDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDG | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 2.47% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 9.39% | -4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.64% | 11.50% | -5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 19.03% | -11.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 21.45% | -14.34% |
HDG vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDG vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
HDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than HTUS's 10.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDG ProShares Hedge Replication | 2.35% | 2.55% | 3.50% | 3.48% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.09% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.68% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDG and HTUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTUS has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to HDG (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDG dropped -15.31% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 10-year performance, HTUS leads with 12.52% vs 3.91% for HDG. On fees, HDG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 2.35% for HDG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HDG and 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDG and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer