HDEF vs. CIL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL).

HDEF and CIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HDEF is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Aug 12, 2015. CIL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2015. Both HDEF and CIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HDEF vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HDEF vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF	5.22%	33.01%	2.85%	18.53%	-2.51%	6.95%	-1.90%	25.02%	-13.74%	9.89%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HDEF having a 5.22% return and CIL slightly higher at 5.44%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HDEF having a 8.88% annualized return and CIL not far behind at 8.47%.

HDEF

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.98%
• YTD: 5.22%
• 6M: 10.37%
• 1Y: 24.35%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 28.86%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEF vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

CIL

VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF

HDEF

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF

Return for Risk

HDEF vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDEF

HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 84
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 84

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 91
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEF vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HDEF	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.28	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	3.13	-0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.53	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	2.33	+0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.05	15.18	-5.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HDEF vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEF and CIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HDEF	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	2.28	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.53	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.49	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.44	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between HDEF and CIL is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HDEF vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than CIL's 2.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF	3.60%	3.88%	4.53%	4.38%	5.41%	4.76%	3.93%	4.20%	3.55%	3.38%	9.53%	1.87%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	2.38%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%

Drawdowns

HDEF vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEF drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, roughly equal to the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEF and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDEF	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.43%	-36.27%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-9.66%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.63%	-29.89%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.43%	-36.27%	-0.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.57%	-0.58%	-3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-6.65%	+1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	1.73%	+0.70%

Volatility

HDEF vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that HDEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDEF	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	0.00%	+4.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	5.73%	+2.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.52%	13.28%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.10%	16.66%	-2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	17.32%	-1.11%