HDAW vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HDAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - HDAW tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index while UMMA tracks the Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDAW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

HDAW vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDAW) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HDAW

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 12.11%
• YTD: 32.32%
• 6M: 35.20%
• 1Y: 51.77%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDAW vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HDAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	6.53%	16.58%	-7.46%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	32.32%	26.65%	4.67%	18.84%	-21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HDAW and UMMA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2022	0.54

The correlation between HDAW and UMMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDAW vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDAW	UMMA
Financial Services	25.2%	-
Basic Materials	12.4%	9.3%
Healthcare	12.3%	16.6%
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	5.6%
Energy	9.1%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	8.1%
Industrials	6.6%	13.5%
Technology	6.3%	42.9%
Communication Services	4.7%	0.8%
Utilities	4.0%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	0.5%

Return for Risk

HDAW vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 76
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDAW vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDAW) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HDAW	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.58	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HDAW	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-34.17%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.90%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.81%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HDAW	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.54%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	20.11%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	20.55%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	20.55%	—

HDAW vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDAW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDAW vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

HDAW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.68%	4.85%	7.00%	4.84%	4.27%	3.95%	4.02%	4.09%	2.92%	1.18%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDAW and UMMA in my portfolio?

HDAW and UMMA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HDAW or UMMA?

On fees, HDAW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDAW or UMMA?

HDAW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HDAW or UMMA?

UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for HDAW.

What is the main difference between HDAW and UMMA?

HDAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while UMMA tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HDAW and 0.65% for UMMA.