PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDAW vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDAW vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDAW) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HDAW

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KEMX

1D
-1.23%
1M
8.82%
YTD
40.51%
6M
46.50%
1Y
75.91%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDAW vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HDAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%6.53%16.58%-5.74%9.73%-3.67%8.27%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
40.51%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HDAW and KEMX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.64

The correlation between HDAW and KEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDAW vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDAW
KEMX

Financial Services

25.2%
20.7%

Basic Materials

12.4%
8.2%

Healthcare

12.3%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
3.0%

Energy

9.1%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
5.4%

Industrials

6.6%
8.6%

Technology

6.3%
41.2%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.2%

Utilities

4.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.2%

Financial Services

HDAW
25.2%
KEMX
20.7%

Basic Materials

HDAW
12.4%
KEMX
8.2%

Healthcare

HDAW
12.3%
KEMX
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

HDAW
10.1%
KEMX
3.0%

Energy

HDAW
9.1%
KEMX
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HDAW
7.5%
KEMX
5.4%

Industrials

HDAW
6.6%
KEMX
8.6%

Technology

HDAW
6.3%
KEMX
41.2%

Communication Services

HDAW
4.7%
KEMX
3.2%

Utilities

HDAW
4.0%
KEMX
2.0%

Real Estate

HDAW
1.8%
KEMX
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDAW vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDAW

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDAW vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDAW) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HDAW vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDAWKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

Drawdowns

HDAW vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDAWKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

Volatility

HDAW vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDAWKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

HDAW vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDAW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDAW vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

HDAW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%2.68%4.85%7.00%4.84%4.27%3.95%4.02%4.09%2.92%1.18%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.33%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDAW and KEMX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDAW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDAW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for HDAW.

HDAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HDAW and 0.25% for KEMX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDAW and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer