PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCYIX vs. CRDBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HCYIX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HCYIX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HCYIX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class
-1.47%8.62%10.38%7.07%-10.69%15.81%9.81%
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
1.84%25.36%19.91%18.44%-8.22%28.08%24.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCYIX achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 1.84% return.


HCYIX

1D
1.07%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
0.10%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
5.47%

CRDBX

1D
4.87%
1M
4.80%
YTD
1.84%
6M
8.34%
1Y
36.76%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCYIX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCYIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HCYIX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCYIX
HCYIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HCYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HCYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDBX
CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCYIX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCYIXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.76

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

3.26

-1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.61

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

5.17

-3.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.98

16.62

-10.63

HCYIX vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCYIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCYIX and CRDBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCYIXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.76

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.01

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.01

+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between HCYIX and CRDBX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HCYIX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

HCYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than CRDBX's 15.08% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCYIX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class
6.42%6.51%3.46%3.05%3.01%2.61%3.36%2.87%4.22%2.75%3.87%4.54%
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
15.08%15.36%12.58%9.91%0.18%25.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HCYIX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCYIX drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCYIX and CRDBX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HCYIXCRDBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-97.00%

+71.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.21%

-7.13%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.75%

-97.00%

+83.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.05%

-95.71%

+91.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-25.67%

+22.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

2.22%

-0.92%

Volatility

HCYIX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) is 2.55%, while Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that HCYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HCYIXCRDBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

5.18%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

10.66%

-6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

21.01%

-14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.47%

1,635.86%

-1,629.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.07%

1,525.82%

-1,517.75%