HCRE.TO vs. RS.TO
HCRE.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF) is REIT fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index (Total Return), while RS.TO (Real Estate Split Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, HCRE.TO returned 4.08%/yr vs 25.30%/yr for RS.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HCRE.TO vs. RS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCRE.TO achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than RS.TO's 15.11% return.
HCRE.TO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- —
RS.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 18.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 25.30%
- 10Y*
- —
HCRE.TO vs. RS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRE.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.90% | 12.54% | 3.71% | 0.93% | -17.12% | 33.69% | 0.27% |
RS.TO Real Estate Split Corp. | 15.11% | -5.54% | 46.43% | 39.95% | 1.16% | 68.30% | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCRE.TO and RS.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2020 | 0.29 |
The correlation between HCRE.TO and RS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCRE.TO vs. RS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HCRE.TO
RS.TO
HCRE.TO vs. RS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF (HCRE.TO) and Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCRE.TO | RS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.42 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 4.31 | +0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCRE.TO | RS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.31 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 1.00 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 1.04 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
HCRE.TO vs. RS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.39%, which is greater than RS.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCRE.TO and RS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCRE.TO | RS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.39% | -28.91% | -14.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -12.94% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -28.91% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | -28.91% | -3.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.91% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -6.91% | -5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 4.24% | -1.48% |
Volatility
HCRE.TO vs. RS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF (HCRE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) at 2.28%. This indicates that HCRE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCRE.TO | RS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 2.28% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 11.41% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 14.02% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 25.55% | -7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 25.88% | -4.26% |
Dividends
HCRE.TO vs. RS.TO - Dividend Comparison
HCRE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRE.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RS.TO Real Estate Split Corp. | 15.89% | 17.11% | 52.56% | 43.23% | 36.14% | 21.58% | 5.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCRE.TO and RS.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HCRE.TO and RS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer