RS.TO vs. FTN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) and Financial 15 Split Corp. (FTN.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RS.TO or FTN.TO.
Key characteristics
| RS.TO | FTN.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.16% | 39.89% |
| 1Y Return | 19.15% | 71.35% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.23% | 9.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.30 | 4.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.93 | 6.14 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.95 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.64 | 1.63 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.33 | 45.22 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.59% | 1.70% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.75% | 15.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.60% | -84.76% |
| Current Drawdown | -23.78% | -9.51% |
Fundamentals
| RS.TO | FTN.TO |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between RS.TO and FTN.TO is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RS.TO vs. FTN.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RS.TO achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than FTN.TO's 39.89% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RS.TO vs. FTN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) and Financial 15 Split Corp. (FTN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RS.TO vs. FTN.TO - Dividend Comparison
RS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.74%, less than FTN.TO's 16.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS.TO Real Estate Split Corp. | 11.74% | 12.13% | 11.14% | 7.11% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTN.TO Financial 15 Split Corp. | 16.15% | 19.38% | 16.38% | 13.16% | 8.94% | 19.74% | 23.69% | 14.69% | 15.67% | 15.51% | 15.62% | 14.90% |
Drawdowns
RS.TO vs. FTN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RS.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum FTN.TO drawdown of -84.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS.TO and FTN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RS.TO vs. FTN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Financial 15 Split Corp. (FTN.TO) at 5.50%. This indicates that RS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RS.TO vs. FTN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Real Estate Split Corp. and Financial 15 Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities