RS.TO vs. RMAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX).

Performance

RS.TO vs. RMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RS.TO vs. RMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RS.TO Real Estate Split Corp.	0.95%	-5.54%	46.43%	39.95%	1.16%	68.30%	-1.68%
RMAX RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.	-23.08%	-32.13%	-13.08%	-27.40%	-31.97%	-14.66%	18.18%

Different Trading Currencies

RS.TO is traded in CAD, while RMAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMAX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RS.TO achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly higher than RMAX's -23.08% return.

RS.TO

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -11.45%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: -4.87%
• 1Y: 11.53%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 24.40%
• 10Y*: —

RMAX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -6.62%
• YTD: -23.08%
• 6M: -38.97%
• 1Y: -33.48%
• 3Y*: -31.33%
• 5Y*: -29.65%
• 10Y*: -14.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RS.TO vs. RMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RS.TO

RS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 61
RS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
RS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

RMAX

RMAX Risk / Return Rank: 12
RMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
RMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
RMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
RMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RS.TO vs. RMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RS.TO	RMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	-0.77	+1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	-0.99	+1.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.89	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	-0.78	+1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	-1.68	+4.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RS.TO vs. RMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the RMAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RS.TO and RMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RS.TO	RMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	-0.77	+1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	-0.69	+1.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	-0.18	+1.13

Correlation

The correlation between RS.TO and RMAX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RS.TO vs. RMAX - Dividend Comparison

RS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.94%, while RMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RS.TO Real Estate Split Corp.	15.94%	17.11%	52.56%	43.23%	36.14%	21.58%	5.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RMAX RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.18%	4.94%	3.02%	2.42%	2.18%	2.60%	1.48%	1.07%	5.36%

Drawdowns

RS.TO vs. RMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RS.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.91%, smaller than the maximum RMAX drawdown of -89.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS.TO and RMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RS.TO	RMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.91%	-89.84%	+60.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.94%	-44.09%	+31.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-84.82%	+55.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.45%	-89.77%	+78.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.08%	-41.69%	+34.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	20.35%	-15.89%

Volatility

RS.TO vs. RMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Real Estate Split Corp. (RS.TO) is 4.65%, while RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX) has a volatility of 13.96%. This indicates that RS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RS.TO	RMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	13.96%	-9.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	29.04%	-17.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.06%	43.50%	-24.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.91%	43.25%	-17.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.20%	44.79%	-18.59%

Financials