PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCRB vs. HMOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCRB vs. HMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCRB achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than HMOP's 1.37% return.


HCRB

1D
0.17%
1M
0.86%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.65%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*

HMOP

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.52%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCRB vs. HMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HCRB
Hartford Core Bond ETF
0.55%7.06%2.23%6.98%-14.61%-1.79%6.87%
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
1.37%4.70%2.52%6.83%-8.37%1.80%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HCRB and HMOP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020

0.56

The correlation between HCRB and HMOP shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCRB vs. HMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCRB
HCRB Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

HMOP
HMOP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCRB vs. HMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCRBHMOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.43

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.08

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

6.58

-2.00

HCRB vs. HMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the HMOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCRB and HMOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCRB vs. HMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCRB drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, which is greater than HMOP's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCRB and HMOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCRBHMOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-13.12%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.70%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

-4.81%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-13.12%

-6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.94%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-2.46%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.85%

+0.14%

Volatility

HCRB vs. HMOP - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) at 0.81%. This indicates that HCRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCRBHMOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

0.81%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

1.86%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

2.65%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.13%

3.87%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

4.25%

+1.69%

HCRB vs. HMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HCRB and HMOP have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Dividends

HCRB vs. HMOP - Dividend Comparison

HCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than HMOP's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HCRB
Hartford Core Bond ETF
4.17%4.12%4.15%3.39%2.18%1.47%1.81%0.00%0.00%
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
3.46%3.40%3.22%2.92%2.12%1.67%5.26%2.87%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCRB and HMOP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCRB has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to HMOP (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCRB dropped -19.90% vs HMOP's -13.12%.

On 5-year performance, HMOP leads with 1.32% vs 0.12% for HCRB. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, HMOP has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HMOP has performed better with a 1.32% return vs 0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HCRB and HMOP have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

HCRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 3.46% for HMOP.

HCRB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while HMOP is Municipal Bonds.

HMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCRB and HMOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer