HCRB vs. HFSI
HCRB (Hartford Core Bond ETF) and HFSI (Hartford Strategic Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCRB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Hartford, while HFSI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Hartford. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HCRB returned 4.50%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for HFSI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HCRB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HFSI.
Performance
HCRB vs. HFSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCRB achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than HFSI's 1.58% return.
HCRB
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
HFSI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 8.71%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCRB vs. HFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF | 0.41% | 7.06% | 2.23% | 6.98% | -14.61% | -1.24% |
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 1.58% | 9.56% | 7.91% | 9.91% | -12.60% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCRB and HFSI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between HCRB and HFSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCRB vs. HFSI — Risk / Return Rank
HCRB
HFSI
HCRB vs. HFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCRB | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.44 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 3.67 | -1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.80 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 11.24 | -5.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCRB | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.44 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.56 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
HCRB vs. HFSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCRB drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, roughly equal to the maximum HFSI drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCRB and HFSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCRB | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -19.34% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -3.06% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.18% | -5.11% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | 0.00% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -5.73% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.76% | +0.16% |
Volatility
HCRB vs. HFSI - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) at 1.13%. This indicates that HCRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCRB | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 1.13% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 2.53% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 3.58% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.13% | 4.97% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.96% | 4.97% | +0.99% |
HCRB vs. HFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSI's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCRB vs. HFSI - Dividend Comparison
HCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than HFSI's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF | 4.18% | 4.12% | 4.15% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 1.47% | 1.81% |
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 5.53% | 5.67% | 6.51% | 5.77% | 4.87% | 0.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCRB and HFSI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCRB has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to HFSI (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCRB dropped -19.90% vs HFSI's -19.34%.
On 3-year performance, HFSI leads with 8.44% vs 4.50% for HCRB. On fees, HCRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HFSI has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HFSI has performed better with a 8.44% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HCRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HFSI.
HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 4.18% for HCRB.
HCRB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while HFSI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HCRB and 0.49% for HFSI.
HFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCRB and HFSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer