PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCPIX vs. UGPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund (HCPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCPIX achieves a -7.94% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -28.27% return. Over the past 10 years, HCPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -13.50% annualized return.


HCPIX

1D
-1.78%
1M
2.33%
YTD
-7.94%
6M
-7.29%
1Y
14.80%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
8.24%

UGPIX

1D
2.84%
1M
-10.07%
YTD
-28.27%
6M
-33.44%
1Y
-13.71%
3Y*
-6.52%
5Y*
-36.28%
10Y*
-13.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund
-7.94%16.02%-1.37%-1.30%-10.60%33.92%16.86%28.41%4.96%19.48%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
-28.27%36.28%-21.79%-11.49%-53.03%-73.86%76.47%40.07%-46.51%105.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HCPIX and UGPIX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2000

0.16

The correlation between HCPIX and UGPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCPIX
HCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

UGPIX
UGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund (HCPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCPIXUGPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

-0.25

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.15

-0.01

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.00

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

-0.32

+1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.28

-0.60

+2.88

HCPIX vs. UGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the UGPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCPIX and UGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCPIXUGPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

-0.25

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

-0.09

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

-0.05

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.05

+0.31

Drawdowns

HCPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCPIX drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCPIX and UGPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCPIXUGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.90%

-99.66%

+34.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-52.67%

+36.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-53.13%

+25.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-98.24%

+70.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-99.10%

+58.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.09%

-97.96%

+84.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.01%

-82.70%

+61.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

28.56%

-21.89%

Volatility

HCPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund (HCPIX) is 5.96%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 17.86%. This indicates that HCPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCPIXUGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

17.86%

-11.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

36.28%

-20.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.91%

51.99%

-30.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

390.11%

-367.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.99%

277.98%

-252.99%

HCPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCPIX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison

HCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than UGPIX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund
0.19%0.17%0.82%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.03%0.00%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
8.43%6.05%2.91%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGPIX has higher volatility (17.86%) compared to HCPIX (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCPIX dropped -64.90% vs UGPIX's -99.66%.

HCPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCPIX and UGPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer