PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCPIX vs. RYRUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCPIX vs. RYRUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund (HCPIX) and Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCPIX achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than RYRUX's 37.75% return. Over the past 10 years, HCPIX has underperformed RYRUX with an annualized return of 8.99%, while RYRUX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.


HCPIX

1D
0.09%
1M
5.72%
6M
0.22%
YTD
2.18%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
8.99%

RYRUX

1D
0.78%
1M
2.02%
6M
18.96%
YTD
37.75%
1Y
65.04%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCPIX vs. RYRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund
2.18%16.02%-1.37%-1.30%-10.60%33.92%16.86%28.41%4.96%19.48%
RYRUX
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund
37.75%12.62%10.94%22.65%-43.88%20.72%16.41%47.20%-26.63%25.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HCPIX and RYRUX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between HCPIX and RYRUX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCPIX vs. RYRUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCPIX
HCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

RYRUX
RYRUX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RYRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RYRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCPIX vs. RYRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund (HCPIX) and Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCPIXRYRUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.07

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

10.39

-6.44

HCPIX vs. RYRUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the RYRUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCPIX and RYRUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCPIX vs. RYRUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCPIX drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, smaller than the maximum RYRUX drawdown of -88.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCPIX and RYRUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCPIXRYRUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.90%

-88.49%

+23.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-22.39%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-49.91%

+22.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-62.41%

+34.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-71.68%

+31.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

-3.40%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-31.13%

+10.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.96%

6.59%

+0.37%

Volatility

HCPIX vs. RYRUX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund (HCPIX) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX) at 7.52%. This indicates that HCPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYRUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCPIXRYRUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.42%

7.52%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.59%

28.35%

-10.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.86%

38.95%

-15.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.68%

45.17%

-22.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.10%

46.79%

-21.69%

HCPIX vs. RYRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCPIX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is lower than RYRUX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCPIX vs. RYRUX - Dividend Comparison

HCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than RYRUX's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Fund
0.17%0.17%0.82%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYRUX
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund
2.67%3.68%2.93%0.35%0.00%0.20%0.00%0.27%0.00%2.57%0.00%28.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCPIX and RYRUX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCPIX has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to RYRUX (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCPIX dropped -64.90% vs RYRUX's -88.49%.

RYRUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCPIX and RYRUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer