PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCMT vs. USPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HCMT vs. USPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HCMT vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
-8.58%7.39%39.14%5.67%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
-4.61%17.78%24.97%10.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMT achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly lower than USPX's -4.61% return.


HCMT

1D
-0.03%
1M
-6.60%
YTD
-8.58%
6M
-5.95%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USPX

1D
2.97%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
-4.61%
6M
-2.31%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCMT vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HCMT vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMT
HCMT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

USPX
USPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
USPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
USPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCMT vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCMTUSPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

0.94

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

1.46

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

1.46

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.48

7.02

-4.54

HCMT vs. USPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the USPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMT and USPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCMTUSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.94

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.71

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between HCMT and USPX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HCMT vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison

HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than USPX's 1.20% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
0.46%0.43%2.75%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
1.20%1.07%1.23%1.35%2.21%2.40%2.51%3.07%2.91%2.60%4.89%

Drawdowns

HCMT vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than USPX's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and USPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HCMTUSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-31.21%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.31%

-12.48%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.50%

-6.45%

-7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-4.51%

-3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

2.60%

+4.33%

Volatility

HCMT vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison

Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) at 5.35%. This indicates that HCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HCMTUSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

5.35%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.08%

9.71%

+10.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.73%

18.75%

+10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.03%

16.15%

+12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.03%

15.98%

+13.05%