HCMT vs. PSMD
HCMT (Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) and PSMD (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HCMT returned 43.14% vs 15.08% for PSMD. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HCMT charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSMD.
Performance
HCMT vs. PSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCMT achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than PSMD's 5.54% return.
HCMT
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 43.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMD
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 15.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- —
HCMT vs. PSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 11.17% | 7.39% | 39.14% | 5.67% |
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF | 5.54% | 11.45% | 12.78% | 6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCMT and PSMD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between HCMT and PSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCMT vs. PSMD — Risk / Return Rank
HCMT
PSMD
HCMT vs. PSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCMT | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.56 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 3.43 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.19 | 18.22 | -11.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCMT | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.70 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.17 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
HCMT vs. PSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than PSMD's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and PSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCMT | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -11.96% | -24.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -4.42% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.12% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -1.66% | -6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 0.83% | +5.18% |
Volatility
HCMT vs. PSMD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) at 0.85%. This indicates that HCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCMT | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 0.85% | +4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 4.42% | +12.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.21% | 5.62% | +18.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.48% | 8.60% | +19.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.48% | 8.47% | +20.01% |
HCMT vs. PSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PSMD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCMT vs. PSMD - Dividend Comparison
HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while PSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 0.38% | 0.43% | 2.75% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCMT and PSMD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCMT has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to PSMD (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMT dropped -36.26% vs PSMD's -11.96%.
On 1-year performance, HCMT leads with 43.14% vs 15.08% for PSMD. On fees, PSMD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PSMD has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HCMT has performed better with a 43.14% return vs 15.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSMD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for HCMT.
HCMT has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for PSMD.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for HCMT and 0.75% for PSMD.
PSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCMT and PSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer