PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCKAX vs. FSRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCKAX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Checks and Balances Fund (HCKAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCKAX achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, HCKAX has outperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 9.16%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.


HCKAX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.48%
YTD
6.47%
6M
6.47%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
9.16%

FSRRX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.69%
6M
9.04%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
5.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCKAX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCKAX
Hartford Checks and Balances Fund
6.47%11.51%12.99%13.00%-13.28%14.28%13.06%22.40%-3.65%14.54%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
8.69%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HCKAX and FSRRX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between HCKAX and FSRRX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCKAX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCKAX
HCKAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HCKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HCKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCKAX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Checks and Balances Fund (HCKAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCKAXFSRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.71

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

8.14

-5.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.51

32.01

-19.49

HCKAX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCKAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCKAX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCKAXFSRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

3.55

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.93

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.59

-0.04

Drawdowns

HCKAX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCKAX drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, which is greater than FSRRX's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCKAX and FSRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCKAXFSRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.69%

-33.42%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-2.05%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.07%

-5.80%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

-12.78%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.91%

-19.93%

-6.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-4.21%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.52%

+0.90%

Volatility

HCKAX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Checks and Balances Fund (HCKAX) has a higher volatility of 2.07% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.30%. This indicates that HCKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCKAXFSRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

1.30%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.14%

3.68%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.95%

4.71%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.76%

6.88%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.57%

6.73%

+4.84%

HCKAX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCKAX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCKAX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

HCKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than FSRRX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.13%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%
HCKAX
Hartford Checks and Balances Fund
6.97%7.43%5.85%4.57%8.94%6.33%4.41%7.45%10.66%13.93%8.70%12.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCKAX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCKAX has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to FSRRX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCKAX dropped -41.69% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCKAX and FSRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer