PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCA vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HCA vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCA achieves a -16.94% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, HCA has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 18.27%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.80% annualized return.


HCA

1D
2.29%
1M
-9.44%
YTD
-16.94%
6M
-19.89%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
18.27%

NEM

1D
2.71%
1M
-15.55%
YTD
0.82%
6M
2.58%
1Y
81.14%
3Y*
36.14%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
13.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCA vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCA
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
-16.94%56.71%11.75%13.83%-5.64%57.58%12.07%20.24%43.37%18.67%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
0.82%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HCA and NEM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2011

0.11

The correlation between HCA and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HCA:

$28.46

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

HCA:

13.60

NEM:

15.82

PEG Ratio

HCA:

1.62

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

HCA:

1.22

NEM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

HCA:

$75.60B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HCA:

$31.37B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

HCA:

$15.60B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCA vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCA
HCA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCA vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCANEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.29

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

2.78

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.44

7.58

-7.15

HCA vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCA Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCA and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCA vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCA and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCANEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.74%

-81.30%

+26.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.62%

-29.39%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.62%

-36.57%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.49%

-62.40%

+22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.74%

-62.40%

+7.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.87%

-23.71%

-5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.04%

-41.37%

+30.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.15%

10.73%

+0.42%

Volatility

HCA vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) is 8.97%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 15.74%. This indicates that HCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCANEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

15.74%

-6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.53%

37.43%

-15.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.33%

47.44%

-20.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.90%

37.99%

-8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.63%

35.67%

-3.04%

Dividends

HCA vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

HCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than NEM's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCA
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
0.76%0.62%0.88%0.89%0.93%0.75%0.63%1.08%1.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

HCA vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HCA Healthcare, Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
19.51B
0
(HCA) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HCA and NEM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to HCA (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCA dropped -54.74% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCA and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer