HCA vs. UHS

In the year-to-date period, HCA achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, HCA has outperformed UHS with an annualized return of 16.90%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.36% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HCA Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is comparable to the UHS Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCA and UHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than UHS's 0.47% yield.

The maximum HCA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, smaller than the maximum UHS drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCA and UHS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) is 10.73%, while Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a volatility of 16.72%. This indicates that HCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HCA Healthcare, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.