HBTC vs. SMST
HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTC is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Fortuna Funds, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBTC returned -37.51% vs 240.03% for SMST. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.
Performance
HBTC vs. SMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -22.42% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -27.96% return.
HBTC
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- -24.82%
- YTD
- -22.42%
- 1Y
- -37.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST
- 1D
- 5.26%
- 1M
- 44.38%
- 6M
- -15.07%
- YTD
- -27.96%
- 1Y
- 240.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBTC vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | -22.42% | 1.18% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -27.96% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBTC and SMST is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025 | -0.76 |
The correlation between HBTC and SMST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBTC vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank
HBTC
SMST
HBTC vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBTC | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.30 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 2.83 | -3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 5.47 | -7.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBTC vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and SMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBTC | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.45% | -99.25% | +58.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.45% | -85.39% | +44.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.73% | -97.17% | +58.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -90.89% | +74.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.66% | 44.09% | -20.43% |
Volatility
HBTC vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) is 5.39%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.59%. This indicates that HBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBTC | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 56.59% | -51.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.08% | 135.88% | -116.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.95% | 149.23% | -121.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.83% | 167.74% | -138.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.83% | 167.74% | -138.91% |
HBTC vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBTC vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison
HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.12%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | 14.12% | 10.96% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBTC and SMST have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMST has higher volatility (56.59%) compared to HBTC (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -40.45% vs SMST's -99.25%.
On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 240.03% vs -37.51% for HBTC. On fees, SMST is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, HBTC has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 240.03% return vs -37.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMST is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.
HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 14.12%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.
HBTC is categorized as Blockchain, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 1.29% for SMST.
SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBTC and SMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer