QBF vs. OBTC
QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - QBF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Innovator, while OBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitcoin (BTC). QBF is actively managed, while OBTC is passively managed. Over the past year, QBF returned -35.86% vs -28.83% for OBTC. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QBF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for OBTC.
Performance
QBF vs. OBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBF achieves a -23.63% return, which is significantly higher than OBTC's -25.45% return.
QBF
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -14.35%
- YTD
- -23.63%
- 6M
- -27.96%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -18.30%
- YTD
- -25.45%
- 6M
- -25.31%
- 1Y
- -28.83%
- 3Y*
- 53.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- —
QBF vs. OBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -23.63% | -14.22% |
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -25.45% | -3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBF and OBTC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QBF and OBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBF vs. OBTC — Risk / Return Rank
QBF
OBTC
QBF vs. OBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBF | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.91 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | -0.64 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | -1.15 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBF | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.37 | -0.65 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.97 | -0.21 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
QBF vs. OBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBF drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, smaller than the maximum OBTC drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBF and OBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBF | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -94.50% | +51.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.92% | -45.41% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -83.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.92% | -62.77% | +19.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -69.63% | +52.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.20% | 25.06% | -0.86% |
Volatility
QBF vs. OBTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) is 7.09%, while Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that QBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBF | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 9.55% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.56% | 34.48% | -15.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.36% | 44.27% | -17.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 58.11% | -29.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 71.56% | -43.03% |
QBF vs. OBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OBTC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBF vs. OBTC - Dividend Comparison
QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while OBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 1.81% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBF and OBTC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OBTC has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to QBF (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBF dropped -42.92% vs OBTC's -94.50%.
On 1-year performance, OBTC leads with -28.83% vs -35.86% for QBF. On fees, OBTC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QBF has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OBTC has performed better with a -28.83% return vs -35.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OBTC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.
QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for OBTC.
QBF is categorized as Blockchain, while OBTC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Osprey Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBF and 0.49% for OBTC.
OBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBF and OBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer