HBRD vs. IDMO
HBRD (Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBRD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HBRD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
HBRD vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HBRD
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IDMO
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.98%
HBRD vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | 0.15% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBRD and IDMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBRD vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
HBRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDMO
HBRD vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBRD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBRD vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBRD drawdown since its inception was -2.94%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBRD and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBRD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -39.38% | +36.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -2.90% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -9.69% | +9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.17% | — |
Volatility
HBRD vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBRD | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 18.71% | -15.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 18.15% | -14.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 17.91% | -14.65% |
HBRD vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBRD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBRD vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
HBRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than IDMO's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBRD Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.65% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBRD and IDMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBRD.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 2.48% for HBRD.
HBRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IDMO is Momentum. HBRD tracks ICE USD Developed Markets Corporate Ex-Banks Hybrid Bond 4.85% Constrained Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBRD and 0.25% for IDMO.
Find the right allocation for HBRD and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer