HBKS.L vs. XGSI.L
HBKS.L (HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD) and XGSI.L (Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged) are both Global Bonds funds - HBKS.L tracks the FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index while XGSI.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. HBKS.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XGSI.L.
Performance
HBKS.L vs. XGSI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HBKS.L is traded in GBP, while XGSI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XGSI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
HBKS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XGSI.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 0.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBKS.L vs. XGSI.L — Risk / Return Rank
HBKS.L
XGSI.L
HBKS.L vs. XGSI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBKS.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.07 | — |
Drawdowns
HBKS.L vs. XGSI.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBKS.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -22.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -17.27% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -12.06% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility
HBKS.L vs. XGSI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBKS.L | XGSI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.98% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 9.06% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 9.22% | — |
HBKS.L vs. XGSI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBKS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XGSI.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBKS.L vs. XGSI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HBKS.L nor XGSI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XGSI.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGSI.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBKS.L.
HBKS.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index, while XGSI.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBKS.L and 0.25% for XGSI.L.
Find the right allocation for HBKS.L and XGSI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer