PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIX.NEO achieves a -30.77% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 12.26% return.


HBIX.NEO

1D
3.78%
1M
-21.97%
YTD
-30.77%
6M
-32.37%
1Y
-42.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XEQT.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.73%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
-30.77%-9.56%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
12.26%21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HBIX.NEO and XEQT.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBIX.NEO
HBIX.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HBIX.NEOXEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.45

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

3.59

-4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

15.41

-16.74

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBIX.NEO and XEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -57.09%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIX.NEO and XEQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBIX.NEOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.09%

-29.74%

-27.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.09%

-8.25%

-48.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.15%

-0.84%

-53.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-4.09%

-20.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.88%

1.92%

+30.96%

Volatility

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) has a higher volatility of 14.38% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 5.02%. This indicates that HBIX.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBIX.NEOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.38%

5.02%

+9.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.42%

10.06%

+31.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.20%

12.17%

+40.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.19%

13.21%

+37.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.19%

15.58%

+35.61%

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIX.NEO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBIX.NEO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.75%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
45.75%20.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.48%1.66%2.03%2.09%2.14%1.66%1.69%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBIX.NEO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.

HBIX.NEO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while XEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HBIX.NEO and 0.20% for XEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBIX.NEO and XEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer