HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HBIX.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBIX.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBIX.NEO returned -41.89% vs 2.22% for CASH.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBIX.NEO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.

Performance

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIX.NEO achieves a -28.85% return, which is significantly lower than CASH.TO's 0.83% return.

HBIX.NEO

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -19.49%
• YTD: -28.85%
• 6M: -33.69%
• 1Y: -41.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CASH.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 2.22%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	-28.85%	-6.82%
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	0.83%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HBIX.NEO and CASH.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBIX.NEO

HBIX.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CASH.TO

CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBIX.NEO	CASH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	10.33	-11.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.08	32.48	-33.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	7.47	-6.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	111.49	-112.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	468.24	-469.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 10.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBIX.NEO and CASH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBIX.NEO	CASH.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	10.33	-11.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.62	5.52	-6.14

Drawdowns

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.90%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIX.NEO and CASH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBIX.NEO	CASH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.90%	-0.80%	-55.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.90%	-0.02%	-55.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.88%	0.00%	-52.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.75%	-0.00%	-23.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.57%	0.00%	+31.57%

Volatility

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that HBIX.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBIX.NEO	CASH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.40%	0.06%	+11.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.52%	0.13%	+41.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.62%	0.22%	+51.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.94%	0.61%	+50.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.94%	0.61%	+50.33%

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIX.NEO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBIX.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.52%, more than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	2.19%	2.53%	4.37%	5.06%	2.30%	0.10%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	44.52%	20.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBIX.NEO and CASH.TO in my portfolio?

HBIX.NEO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBIX.NEO or CASH.TO?

On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBIX.NEO or CASH.TO?

CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.

What is the main difference between HBIX.NEO and CASH.TO?

HBIX.NEO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HBIX.NEO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.