HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO
HBIX.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF) and AMHE.TO (Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - HBIX.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest, while AMHE.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBIX.NEO returned -43.20% vs 27.55% for AMHE.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBIX.NEO charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for AMHE.TO.
Performance
HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBIX.NEO achieves a -31.13% return, which is significantly lower than AMHE.TO's 10.09% return.
HBIX.NEO
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -23.49%
- YTD
- -31.13%
- 6M
- -35.51%
- 1Y
- -43.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMHE.TO
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | -31.13% | -6.82% |
AMHE.TO Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 10.09% | 30.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBIX.NEO and AMHE.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBIX.NEO
AMHE.TO
HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AMHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBIX.NEO | AMHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.17 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.10 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 2.84 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBIX.NEO | AMHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | 0.86 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 0.73 | -1.39 |
Drawdowns
HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.90%, which is greater than AMHE.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIX.NEO and AMHE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBIX.NEO | AMHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.90% | -36.83% | -19.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.90% | -25.14% | -30.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.39% | -8.33% | -46.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.86% | -10.66% | -13.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.75% | 9.72% | +22.03% |
Volatility
HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AMHE.TO) at 9.94%. This indicates that HBIX.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMHE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBIX.NEO | AMHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.19% | 9.94% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.86% | 22.49% | +18.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.68% | 32.12% | +19.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.94% | 35.95% | +14.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.94% | 35.95% | +14.99% |
HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBIX.NEO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AMHE.TO's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBIX.NEO vs. AMHE.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.99%, more than AMHE.TO's 14.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMHE.TO Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 14.14% | 14.31% | 4.24% |
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | 45.99% | 20.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBIX.NEO and AMHE.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBIX.NEO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBIX.NEO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for AMHE.TO.
HBIX.NEO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while AMHE.TO is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HBIX.NEO and 1.88% for AMHE.TO.
Find the right allocation for HBIX.NEO and AMHE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer