HBGD.TO vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
HBGD.TO and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBGD.TO is managed by Global X. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010.
Performance
HBGD.TO vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HBGD.TO vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | -0.49% | 53.48% | 15.92% | 129.66% | -56.87% | 375.98% | 117.21% | 41.31% | -100.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 14.87% | 59.51% | 7.96% | 43.02% | -5.00% | 56.15% | 38.94% | -8.28% | -8.40% |
Different Trading Currencies
HBGD.TO is traded in CAD, while URA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBGD.TO achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 7.52% return.
HBGD.TO
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 84.40%
- 3Y*
- 43.43%
- 5Y*
- 38.80%
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -14.93%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 100.32%
- 3Y*
- 38.79%
- 5Y*
- 25.58%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HBGD.TO vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBGD.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HBGD.TO vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
HBGD.TO
URA
HBGD.TO vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBGD.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 2.13 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 2.68 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 3.55 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 8.39 | +2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBGD.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.13 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.64 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.77 | -0.01 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between HBGD.TO and URA is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HBGD.TO vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than URA's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.53% | 0.64% | 1.22% | 0.83% | 0.32% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.30% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Drawdowns
HBGD.TO vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than URA's maximum drawdown of -90.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBGD.TO and URA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBGD.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -93.54% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | -28.43% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.43% | -37.90% | -25.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -45.04% | -54.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -75.40% | -24.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 11.82% | -4.28% |
Volatility
HBGD.TO vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) is 13.09%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 14.31%. This indicates that HBGD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HBGD.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 14.31% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.05% | 37.29% | -8.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.10% | 47.47% | -7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.43% | 40.43% | +56.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.08% | 34.78% | +53.30% |