PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBFBX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBFBX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBFBX achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, HBFBX has underperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 5.95%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.


HBFBX

1D
0.23%
1M
2.47%
YTD
5.73%
6M
5.32%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
5.95%

HFCVX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.10%
YTD
13.70%
6M
14.88%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBFBX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HBFBX
Hennessy Balanced Fund
5.73%9.90%4.81%7.62%3.83%8.07%-2.98%9.71%0.06%8.34%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
13.70%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HBFBX and HFCVX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1996

0.87

The correlation between HBFBX and HFCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBFBX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBFBX
HBFBX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HBFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HBFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBFBX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBFBXHFCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.51

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

7.07

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

21.66

-11.44

HBFBX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBFBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBFBX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBFBXHFCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.91

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.89

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Drawdowns

HBFBX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBFBX drawdown since its inception was -41.61%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBFBX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBFBXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.61%

-65.75%

+24.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-3.77%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-11.32%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

-16.81%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

-39.39%

+22.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-1.29%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-8.24%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.23%

+0.02%

Volatility

HBFBX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) is 1.78%, while Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that HBFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBFBXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

2.79%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

6.85%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.54%

9.16%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

13.26%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.14%

16.46%

-8.32%

HBFBX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBFBX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBFBX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

HBFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than HFCVX's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBFBX
Hennessy Balanced Fund
1.77%1.90%5.40%4.62%9.50%3.79%0.95%5.20%5.51%7.62%7.76%2.53%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.50%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBFBX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCVX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to HBFBX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBFBX dropped -41.61% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBFBX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer