HBB.TO vs. HAD.TO
HBB.TO (Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF) and HAD.TO (Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds from Global X. HBB.TO is passively managed, while HAD.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, HBB.TO returned 1.16%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for HAD.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HBB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HBB.TO having a 0.90% return and HAD.TO slightly lower at 0.86%. Over the past 10 years, HBB.TO has underperformed HAD.TO with an annualized return of 1.16%, while HAD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.37% annualized return.
HBB.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.16%
HAD.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
HBB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.90% | 1.84% | 3.96% | 5.76% | -11.94% | -2.35% | 8.33% | 5.81% | 1.19% | 1.98% |
HAD.TO Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF | 0.86% | 3.04% | 4.29% | 6.25% | -12.17% | -4.66% | 9.99% | 5.62% | 2.59% | 4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBB.TO and HAD.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014 | 0.35 |
The correlation between HBB.TO and HAD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBB.TO vs. HAD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBB.TO
HAD.TO
HBB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) and Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBB.TO | HAD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | 3.77 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, smaller than the maximum HAD.TO drawdown of -22.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBB.TO and HAD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBB.TO | HAD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.23% | -22.77% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.78% | -3.05% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.16% | -5.95% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -17.19% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.23% | -22.77% | +4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -4.49% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -5.45% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.16% | 0.00% |
Volatility
HBB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) is 1.20%, while Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that HBB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBB.TO | HAD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.46% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.45% | 3.60% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 4.94% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 7.05% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.09% | 8.90% | -1.81% |
Dividends
HBB.TO vs. HAD.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAD.TO Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF | 3.73% | 3.46% | 3.14% | 3.04% | 3.12% | 2.09% | 2.04% | 2.29% | 2.64% | 2.85% | 2.96% | 2.61% |
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBB.TO and HAD.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HBB.TO and HAD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer