HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HAD.TO (Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF) and CDLB.TO (CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series) are both exchange-traded funds - HAD.TO is a Total Bond Market fund actively managed by Global X, while CDLB.TO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAD.TO returned 0.24%/yr vs -0.57%/yr for CDLB.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) and CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAD.TO achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than CDLB.TO's -0.42% return.

HAD.TO

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 0.64%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: 0.24%
• 10Y*: 1.37%

CDLB.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.43%
• 6M: -0.42%
• YTD: -0.42%
• 1Y: 2.92%
• 3Y*: 3.31%
• 5Y*: -0.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HAD.TO Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF	0.97%	3.04%	4.29%	6.25%	-12.17%	-4.66%	2.95%
CDLB.TO CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series	-0.42%	5.44%	2.91%	2.39%	-12.02%	-0.11%	3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HAD.TO and CDLB.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2020	0.15

Return for Risk

HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAD.TO

HAD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 27
HAD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
HAD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
HAD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
HAD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
HAD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

CDLB.TO

CDLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 31
CDLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CDLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CDLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CDLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CDLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) and CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAD.TO	CDLB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.77	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	1.15	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.26	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	1.39	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.48	2.87	+0.61

HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the CDLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAD.TO and CDLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAD.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.77%, which is greater than CDLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAD.TO and CDLB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAD.TO	CDLB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.77%	-16.85%	-5.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	-2.11%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.95%	-5.32%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.19%	-16.85%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.38%	-3.30%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-6.34%	+0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	1.02%	+0.13%

Volatility

HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO) at 0.69%. This indicates that HAD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAD.TO	CDLB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	0.69%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.61%	2.45%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.98%	3.83%	+1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.06%	5.36%	+1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.90%	4.91%	+3.99%

Dividends

HAD.TO vs. CDLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

HAD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than CDLB.TO's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDLB.TO CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series	4.54%	4.45%	4.65%	3.87%	2.81%	2.38%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HAD.TO Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF	3.73%	3.46%	3.14%	3.04%	3.12%	2.09%	2.04%	2.29%	2.64%	2.85%	2.96%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAD.TO and CDLB.TO in my portfolio?

HAD.TO and CDLB.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HAD.TO and CDLB.TO?

HAD.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while CDLB.TO is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Global X and CI Global Asset Management.