PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) and CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAD.TO achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than CAGG.TO's 1.35% return.


HAD.TO

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.64%
YTD
0.97%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
1.37%

CAGG.TO

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.45%
6M
0.76%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAD.TO
Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF
0.97%3.04%4.29%6.25%-12.17%-4.66%9.99%5.62%2.59%-1.05%
CAGG.TO
CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.35%2.45%4.41%7.28%-11.36%-3.39%7.32%9.39%0.30%-0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HAD.TO and CAGG.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017

0.43

The correlation between HAD.TO and CAGG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAD.TO
HAD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HAD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

CAGG.TO
CAGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CAGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) and CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAD.TOCAGG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.65

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.48

4.11

-0.63

HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the CAGG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAD.TO and CAGG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAD.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.77%, which is greater than CAGG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAD.TO and CAGG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAD.TOCAGG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.77%

-18.77%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.73%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-4.47%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-16.68%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-1.09%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-5.48%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.10%

+0.05%

Volatility

HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) and CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGG.TO) have volatilities of 1.46% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAD.TOCAGG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

1.41%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.61%

3.28%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

4.29%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

6.19%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.90%

7.03%

+1.87%

Dividends

HAD.TO vs. CAGG.TO - Dividend Comparison

HAD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than CAGG.TO's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAGG.TO
CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.56%3.36%2.82%3.25%4.11%2.42%2.77%3.00%2.74%1.51%0.00%0.00%
HAD.TO
Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF
3.73%3.46%3.14%3.04%3.12%2.09%2.04%2.29%2.64%2.85%2.96%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAD.TO and CAGG.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAD.TO and CAGG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer