HAVGX vs. MUHLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX).
HAVGX is managed by Haverford. It was launched on Jun 30, 2004. MUHLX is managed by Muhlenkamp. It was launched on Nov 1, 1988.
Performance
HAVGX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HAVGX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAVGX Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund | -3.84% | 13.22% | 15.58% | 9.26% | -7.97% | 24.40% | 15.35% | 33.26% | -5.90% | 18.46% |
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund | 9.11% | 17.82% | 3.38% | 13.92% | 2.89% | 28.98% | 11.96% | 14.39% | -13.29% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAVGX achieves a -3.84% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 9.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HAVGX having a 11.00% annualized return and MUHLX not far behind at 10.68%.
HAVGX
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -3.84%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
MUHLX
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 22.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAVGX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAVGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HAVGX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank
HAVGX
MUHLX
HAVGX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAVGX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 1.42 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.97 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.28 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 2.37 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 8.57 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAVGX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.42 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.82 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.63 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.51 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between HAVGX and MUHLX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HAVGX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison
HAVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.59%, more than MUHLX's 3.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAVGX Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund | 8.59% | 8.28% | 8.54% | 4.76% | 10.14% | 5.65% | 0.84% | 1.39% | 6.38% | 2.65% | 1.18% | 1.26% |
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund | 3.06% | 3.34% | 0.58% | 0.89% | 6.80% | 7.77% | 10.28% | 1.26% | 14.70% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 11.02% |
Drawdowns
HAVGX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAVGX drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAVGX and MUHLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAVGX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.37% | -62.05% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -10.23% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.65% | -18.63% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.50% | -40.85% | +6.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.57% | -5.65% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -10.81% | +4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.83% | -0.33% |
Volatility
HAVGX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) is 4.21%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that HAVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HAVGX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 6.01% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 12.06% | -4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 16.85% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 14.77% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 17.04% | -0.02% |