PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAUZ vs. HYLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAUZ vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAUZ achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.53% return.


HAUZ

1D
-1.44%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-2.64%
6M
-1.65%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
-1.54%
10Y*
3.62%

HYLB

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.53%
6M
2.00%
1Y
6.87%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAUZ vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
-2.64%22.70%-5.44%6.29%-22.24%9.82%-6.23%20.89%-9.12%27.52%
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.53%8.74%8.14%12.03%-10.80%3.94%5.04%14.06%-1.80%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HAUZ and HYLB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2016

0.56

The correlation between HAUZ and HYLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAUZ vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAUZ
HAUZ Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HAUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HAUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLB
HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAUZ vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAUZHYLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.37

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

3.04

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

13.06

-11.78

HAUZ vs. HYLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAUZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the HYLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAUZ and HYLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAUZHYLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

1.86

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.54

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.58

-0.41

Drawdowns

HAUZ vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAUZ drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, which is greater than HYLB's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUZ and HYLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAUZHYLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.51%

-22.91%

-16.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-2.27%

-11.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.88%

-4.51%

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-15.54%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.73%

-0.19%

-11.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-2.43%

-9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

0.53%

+4.12%

Volatility

HAUZ vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) at 1.20%. This indicates that HAUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAUZHYLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

1.20%

+3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

2.93%

+8.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

3.70%

+10.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

7.47%

+8.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

8.18%

+8.79%

HAUZ vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAUZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HAUZ vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

HAUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than HYLB's 6.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
4.58%4.46%4.50%3.50%1.99%4.84%3.37%3.69%1.93%2.59%2.18%9.42%
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.49%6.29%6.31%5.84%5.53%4.45%5.22%5.71%5.95%5.85%0.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAUZ and HYLB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAUZ has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to HYLB (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUZ dropped -39.51% vs HYLB's -22.91%.

On 5-year performance, HYLB leads with 4.04% vs -1.54% for HAUZ. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HYLB has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 4.04% return vs -1.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HYLB.

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 4.58% for HAUZ.

HAUZ is categorized as REIT, while HYLB is High Yield Bonds. HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HAUZ and 0.15% for HYLB.

HYLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAUZ and HYLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer