HAUZ vs. HYLB
HAUZ (Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAUZ is a REIT fund tracking the iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while HYLB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAUZ returned -1.54%/yr vs 4.04%/yr for HYLB. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAUZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.
Performance
HAUZ vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAUZ achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.53% return.
HAUZ
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
HYLB
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.87%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- —
HAUZ vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | -2.64% | 22.70% | -5.44% | 6.29% | -22.24% | 9.82% | -6.23% | 20.89% | -9.12% | 27.52% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.53% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -10.80% | 3.94% | 5.04% | 14.06% | -1.80% | 6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAUZ and HYLB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2016 | 0.56 |
The correlation between HAUZ and HYLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAUZ vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
HAUZ
HYLB
HAUZ vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAUZ | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.37 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 3.04 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 13.06 | -11.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAUZ | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.86 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.54 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.58 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
HAUZ vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAUZ drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, which is greater than HYLB's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUZ and HYLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAUZ | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.51% | -22.91% | -16.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -2.27% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.88% | -4.51% | -13.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.52% | -15.54% | -18.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.73% | -0.19% | -11.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -2.43% | -9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 0.53% | +4.12% |
Volatility
HAUZ vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) at 1.20%. This indicates that HAUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAUZ | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 1.20% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 2.93% | +8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 3.70% | +10.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 7.47% | +8.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 8.18% | +8.79% |
HAUZ vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAUZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HAUZ vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
HAUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than HYLB's 6.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | 4.58% | 4.46% | 4.50% | 3.50% | 1.99% | 4.84% | 3.37% | 3.69% | 1.93% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 9.42% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.49% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAUZ and HYLB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAUZ has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to HYLB (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUZ dropped -39.51% vs HYLB's -22.91%.
On 5-year performance, HYLB leads with 4.04% vs -1.54% for HAUZ. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HYLB has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 4.04% return vs -1.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HYLB.
HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 4.58% for HAUZ.
HAUZ is categorized as REIT, while HYLB is High Yield Bonds. HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HAUZ and 0.15% for HYLB.
HYLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAUZ and HYLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer