HAUS vs. MBB
HAUS (Residential REIT ETF) and MBB (iShares MBS Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAUS is a REIT fund actively managed by Armada ETF Advisors, while MBB is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index. HAUS is actively managed, while MBB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAUS returned 8.32%/yr vs 4.45%/yr for MBB. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAUS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for MBB.
Performance
HAUS vs. MBB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAUS achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly higher than MBB's 0.81% return.
HAUS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBB
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
HAUS vs. MBB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUS Residential REIT ETF | 4.13% | -1.14% | 15.93% | 13.14% | -22.47% |
MBB iShares MBS Bond ETF | 0.81% | 8.38% | 1.31% | 5.01% | -9.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAUS and MBB is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAUS vs. MBB — Risk / Return Rank
HAUS
MBB
HAUS vs. MBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAUS | MBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 1.55 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 2.28 | -1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.28 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 2.24 | -1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 7.49 | -6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAUS | MBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 1.55 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.59 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
HAUS vs. MBB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAUS drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than MBB's maximum drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUS and MBB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAUS | MBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -17.64% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -2.94% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -7.68% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -1.29% | -6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | -2.35% | -15.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 0.88% | +2.16% |
Volatility
HAUS vs. MBB - Volatility Comparison
Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) at 1.62%. This indicates that HAUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAUS | MBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 1.62% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 3.24% | +6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 4.51% | +9.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 6.81% | +12.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 5.31% | +14.20% |
HAUS vs. MBB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAUS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MBB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAUS vs. MBB - Dividend Comparison
HAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than MBB's 4.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUS Residential REIT ETF | 3.48% | 4.42% | 2.08% | 2.61% | 2.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MBB iShares MBS Bond ETF | 4.27% | 4.21% | 3.94% | 3.40% | 2.31% | 1.05% | 2.10% | 2.77% | 2.64% | 2.23% | 2.58% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAUS and MBB have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAUS has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to MBB (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUS dropped -35.91% vs MBB's -17.64%.
On 3-year performance, HAUS leads with 8.32% vs 4.45% for MBB. On fees, MBB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, MBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HAUS has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MBB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HAUS.
MBB has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 3.48% for HAUS.
HAUS is categorized as REIT, while MBB is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Armada ETF Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAUS and 0.06% for MBB.
MBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAUS and MBB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer