HASGX vs. QISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX).
HASGX is managed by Harbor. It was launched on Nov 1, 2000. QISGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
HASGX vs. QISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HASGX vs. QISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HASGX Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.58% | 11.44% | 9.34% | 22.20% | -25.60% | 9.40% | 38.54% | 42.39% | -11.37% | 24.71% |
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | -3.30% | 17.72% | 15.63% | 19.63% | -27.94% | 18.14% | 29.91% | 21.14% | -6.33% | 25.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HASGX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than QISGX's -3.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HASGX having a 11.71% annualized return and QISGX not far behind at 11.53%.
HASGX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 25.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
QISGX
- 1D
- 4.16%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HASGX vs. QISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HASGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than QISGX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HASGX vs. QISGX — Risk / Return Rank
HASGX
QISGX
HASGX vs. QISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HASGX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.27 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.90 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.84 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.44 | 6.52 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HASGX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.27 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.19 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.47 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.35 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between HASGX and QISGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HASGX vs. QISGX - Dividend Comparison
HASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than QISGX's 4.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HASGX Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.12% | 1.13% | 3.53% | 0.03% | 4.80% | 27.66% | 7.21% | 3.44% | 27.29% | 10.10% | 0.47% | 13.13% |
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | 4.05% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 3.63% | 29.34% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 7.03% | 5.09% | 1.61% | 18.51% |
Drawdowns
HASGX vs. QISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HASGX drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, smaller than the maximum QISGX drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HASGX and QISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HASGX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.33% | -60.75% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.11% | -13.23% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.17% | -38.60% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.53% | -45.08% | +6.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.94% | -9.62% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.23% | -13.99% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.73% | -0.17% |
Volatility
HASGX vs. QISGX - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) at 8.17%. This indicates that HASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HASGX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 8.17% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 16.54% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.72% | 22.52% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 24.48% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.06% | 24.65% | -1.59% |