QISGX vs. BEARX
QISGX (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund) and BEARX (Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd) are both mutual funds - QISGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated, while BEARX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, QISGX returned 13.48%/yr vs -14.61%/yr for BEARX. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. QISGX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for BEARX.
Performance
QISGX vs. BEARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QISGX achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly higher than BEARX's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, QISGX has outperformed BEARX with an annualized return of 13.48%, while BEARX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.61% annualized return.
QISGX
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 42.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
BEARX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -9.06%
- 1Y
- -18.52%
- 3Y*
- -16.62%
- 5Y*
- -12.25%
- 10Y*
- -14.61%
QISGX vs. BEARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | 17.51% | 17.72% | 15.63% | 19.63% | -27.94% | 18.14% | 29.91% | 21.14% | -6.33% | 25.17% |
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | -8.97% | -12.42% | -20.34% | -18.67% | 17.78% | -23.78% | -22.95% | -19.95% | -5.96% | -15.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QISGX and BEARX is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006 | -0.81 |
The correlation between QISGX and BEARX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QISGX vs. BEARX — Risk / Return Rank
QISGX
BEARX
QISGX vs. BEARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QISGX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.71 | +0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | -0.99 | +4.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | -1.86 | +14.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QISGX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | -1.70 | +3.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | -0.72 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | -0.88 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | -0.02 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
QISGX vs. BEARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QISGX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, smaller than the maximum BEARX drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QISGX and BEARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QISGX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -95.75% | +35.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.23% | -19.52% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.28% | -44.46% | +17.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.60% | -52.48% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.08% | -80.48% | +35.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -95.72% | +94.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -61.05% | +47.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 10.52% | -6.99% |
Volatility
QISGX vs. BEARX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) at 2.87%. This indicates that QISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QISGX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 2.87% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 8.77% | +7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 11.34% | +9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 16.97% | +7.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 16.67% | +8.02% |
QISGX vs. BEARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QISGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BEARX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
QISGX vs. BEARX - Dividend Comparison
QISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than BEARX's 7.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 7.37% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | 3.33% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 3.63% | 29.34% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 7.03% | 5.09% | 1.61% | 18.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QISGX and BEARX have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QISGX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to BEARX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QISGX dropped -60.75% vs BEARX's -95.75%.
QISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QISGX and BEARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer