PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HASGX vs. NBMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HASGX vs. NBMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) and Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HASGX achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly lower than NBMIX's 20.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HASGX has underperformed NBMIX with an annualized return of 12.94%, while NBMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.


HASGX

1D
0.89%
1M
3.06%
YTD
18.25%
6M
17.11%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
12.94%

NBMIX

1D
2.56%
1M
6.28%
YTD
20.21%
6M
17.81%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HASGX vs. NBMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HASGX
Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund
18.25%11.44%9.34%22.20%-25.60%9.40%38.54%42.39%-11.37%24.71%
NBMIX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund
20.21%9.87%25.90%10.01%-24.43%4.16%42.83%34.55%4.80%28.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HASGX and NBMIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2000

0.93

The correlation between HASGX and NBMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HASGX vs. NBMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HASGX
HASGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
HASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

NBMIX
NBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HASGX vs. NBMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) and Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HASGXNBMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.46

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

9.11

+2.47

HASGX vs. NBMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HASGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the NBMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HASGX and NBMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HASGXNBMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.67

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.34

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.40

+0.01

Drawdowns

HASGX vs. NBMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HASGX drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, smaller than the maximum NBMIX drawdown of -78.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HASGX and NBMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HASGXNBMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.33%

-78.77%

+24.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.93%

-16.65%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-29.53%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.17%

-36.96%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.53%

-39.55%

+1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.10%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-34.51%

+24.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

4.48%

-1.29%

Volatility

HASGX vs. NBMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) is 6.19%, while Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) has a volatility of 8.85%. This indicates that HASGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HASGXNBMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

8.85%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

19.44%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.13%

24.51%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.32%

24.87%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

24.42%

-1.26%

HASGX vs. NBMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HASGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than NBMIX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

HASGX vs. NBMIX - Dividend Comparison

HASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than NBMIX's 5.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HASGX
Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund
0.95%1.13%3.53%0.03%4.80%27.66%7.21%3.44%27.29%10.10%0.47%13.13%
NBMIX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund
5.60%6.74%0.46%0.00%0.00%18.71%1.06%3.98%23.77%1.44%0.00%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, HASGX and NBMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NBMIX has higher volatility (8.85%) compared to HASGX (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HASGX dropped -54.33% vs NBMIX's -78.77%.

HASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HASGX and NBMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer