HARD vs. BDRY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HARD (Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both Commodities funds. HARD is actively managed, while BDRY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HARD returned 9.88%/yr vs 24.09%/yr for BDRY. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. HARD charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.

Performance

HARD vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HARD achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 34.21% return.

HARD

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -12.47%
• YTD: 3.42%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 8.63%
• 3Y*: 9.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDRY

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: 34.21%
• 6M: 34.67%
• 1Y: 103.63%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: -16.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HARD vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HARD Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.42%	12.19%	20.48%	-5.04%
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF	34.21%	44.24%	-47.40%	22.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HARD and BDRY is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023	-0.06

Return for Risk

HARD vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HARD

HARD Risk / Return Rank: 14
HARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
HARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
HARD Omega Ratio Rank: 13
HARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HARD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BDRY

BDRY Risk / Return Rank: 75
BDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HARD vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HARD	BDRY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	2.48	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	2.90	-2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.36	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	4.82	-4.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.37	13.59	-12.22

HARD vs. BDRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HARD Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the BDRY Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HARD and BDRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HARD vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HARD drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HARD and BDRY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HARD	BDRY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.27%	-89.16%	+69.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.27%	-21.60%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.27%	-69.71%	+50.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-89.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.27%	-71.65%	+52.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-58.43%	+52.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.31%	7.65%	-1.34%

Volatility

HARD vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) is 5.05%, while Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that HARD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HARD	BDRY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	7.30%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.92%	29.14%	-7.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.36%	42.10%	-15.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	60.24%	-41.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	62.40%	-43.34%

HARD vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HARD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

HARD vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison

HARD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HARD Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	2.90%	2.36%	3.51%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HARD and BDRY in my portfolio?

HARD and BDRY have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HARD or BDRY?

BDRY has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to HARD (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HARD dropped -19.27% vs BDRY's -89.16%.

Which ETF is better, HARD or BDRY?

On 3-year performance, BDRY leads with 24.09% vs 9.88% for HARD. On fees, HARD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HARD has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HARD or BDRY?

Over the 3-year period, BDRY has performed better with a 24.09% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HARD or BDRY?

HARD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HARD or BDRY?

HARD has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.

What is the main difference between HARD and BDRY?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HARD and 3.76% for BDRY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.