HAPS vs. RB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAPS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.

Performance

HAPS vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.95% return.

HAPS

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 11.51%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 29.51%
• 3Y*: 12.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RB

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAPS vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	11.51%	12.17%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	6.95%	10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HAPS and RB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

HAPS vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAPS

HAPS Risk / Return Rank: 53
HAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
HAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
HAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
HAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
HAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAPS vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAPS	RB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAPS	RB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	3.19	-2.63

Drawdowns

HAPS vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and RB.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAPS	RB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-1.70%	-25.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.30%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-0.41%	-5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HAPS	RB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.98%	6.21%	+10.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.83%	6.21%	+14.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.83%	6.21%	+14.62%

HAPS vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAPS vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than RB's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	0.51%	0.57%	0.72%	0.42%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	1.99%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAPS and RB in my portfolio?

HAPS and RB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HAPS or RB?

On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAPS or RB?

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HAPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAPS or RB?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.51% for HAPS.

What is the main difference between HAPS and RB?

HAPS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. HAPS tracks Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.58% for RB.