HAPS vs. OILK
HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAPS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAPS returned 12.03%/yr vs 18.48%/yr for OILK. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
HAPS vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.95% return.
HAPS
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 61.95%
- 6M
- 59.31%
- 1Y
- 57.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- —
HAPS vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 11.51% | 8.35% | 4.08% | 12.44% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 61.95% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAPS and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023 | 0.03 |
The correlation between HAPS and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HAPS vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAPS
OILK
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HAPS
OILK
-
Healthcare
HAPS
OILK
-
Technology
HAPS
OILK
-
Industrials
HAPS
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
HAPS
OILK
Energy
HAPS
OILK
-
Real Estate
HAPS
OILK
-
Basic Materials
HAPS
OILK
-
Communication Services
HAPS
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
HAPS
OILK
-
Utilities
HAPS
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAPS vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
HAPS
OILK
HAPS vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAPS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.03 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 2.55 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.61 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 7.33 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAPS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.03 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.11 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
HAPS vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAPS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -83.76% | +56.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -17.35% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | -23.42% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -4.99% | +4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -32.62% | +26.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 8.56% | -5.59% |
Volatility
HAPS vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is 4.16%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that HAPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAPS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 11.11% | -6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 23.24% | -11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 28.86% | -11.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 30.11% | -9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 35.98% | -15.15% |
HAPS vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAPS vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than OILK's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 0.51% | 0.57% | 0.72% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.29% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAPS and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to HAPS (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPS dropped -27.44% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 18.48% vs 12.03% for HAPS. On fees, HAPS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HAPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 18.48% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAPS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.51% for HAPS.
HAPS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. HAPS tracks Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAPS and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer