HAPS vs. FYX
HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - HAPS tracks the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross while FYX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAPS returned 11.58%/yr vs 20.01%/yr for FYX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FYX.
Performance
HAPS vs. FYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 18.13% return.
HAPS
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 26.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 43.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
HAPS vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 10.18% | 8.35% | 4.08% | 12.44% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 18.13% | 12.68% | 12.22% | 15.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAPS and FYX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between HAPS and FYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
HAPS vs. FYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAPS
FYX
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
HAPS
FYX
Healthcare
HAPS
FYX
Technology
HAPS
FYX
Industrials
HAPS
FYX
Consumer Cyclical
HAPS
FYX
Energy
HAPS
FYX
Real Estate
HAPS
FYX
Basic Materials
HAPS
FYX
Communication Services
HAPS
FYX
Consumer Defensive
HAPS
FYX
Utilities
HAPS
FYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAPS vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank
HAPS
FYX
HAPS vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAPS | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 2.41 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 3.43 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 5.80 | -3.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 18.69 | -9.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAPS | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 2.41 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.36 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
HAPS vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and FYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAPS | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -61.80% | +34.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -7.56% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | -27.91% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -1.48% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -10.89% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.34% | +0.63% |
Volatility
HAPS vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is 4.32%, while First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that HAPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAPS | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 4.71% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.76% | 12.03% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 18.28% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 21.96% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 24.21% | -3.38% |
HAPS vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAPS vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison
HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FYX's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.69% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 0.51% | 0.57% | 0.72% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, HAPS and FYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FYX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to HAPS (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPS dropped -27.44% vs FYX's -61.80%.
On 3-year performance, FYX leads with 20.01% vs 11.58% for HAPS. On fees, HAPS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HAPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FYX has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAPS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
FYX has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.51% for HAPS.
HAPS tracks Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.63% for FYX.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAPS and FYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer