PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAPI vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAPI vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAPI achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 27.82% return.


HAPI

1D
1.31%
1M
1.36%
6M
8.44%
YTD
9.76%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.12%

AFOS

1D
0.79%
1M
-2.57%
6M
16.56%
YTD
27.82%
1Y
64.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
66.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$478.32K$472.43K$519.92K
$76.70K$60.15K$72.78K

HAPI vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HAPI
Harbor Corporate Culture ETF
9.76%10.85%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
27.82%37.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HAPI and AFOS is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.69

The correlation between HAPI and AFOS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAPI vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HAPI
HAPI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AFOS
AFOS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AFOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFOS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AFOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HAPI vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAPIAFOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.44

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

5.34

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

20.21

-11.35

HAPI vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the AFOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAPI and AFOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAPI vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAPI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPI and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAPIAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-11.80%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-11.80%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-6.55%

+6.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-1.80%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.11%

-1.13%

Volatility

HAPI vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) is 3.19%, while ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that HAPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAPIAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

8.33%

-5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

19.47%

-10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

23.16%

-11.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

22.37%

-6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

22.37%

-6.75%

HAPI vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAPI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAPI vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

HAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than AFOS's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.23%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HAPI
Harbor Corporate Culture ETF
0.79%0.87%0.21%1.21%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAPI and AFOS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFOS has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to HAPI (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPI dropped -19.46% vs AFOS's -11.80%.

On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 64.93% vs 18.78% for HAPI. On fees, HAPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HAPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 64.93% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

HAPI has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAPI and 0.45% for AFOS.

AFOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAPI and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer