HAP vs. XEG.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) and XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index while XEG.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HAP returned 11.95%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for XEG.TO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XEG.TO.

Performance

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HAP is traded in USD, while XEG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XEG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 35.78% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has outperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 11.95%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return.

HAP

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -4.04%
• YTD: 18.44%
• 6M: 19.25%
• 1Y: 38.39%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: 11.95%

XEG.TO

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -5.73%
• YTD: 35.78%
• 6M: 35.60%
• 1Y: 47.05%
• 3Y*: 24.51%
• 5Y*: 24.38%
• 10Y*: 10.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	18.44%	34.91%	-4.08%	2.46%	7.84%	25.04%	6.30%	18.60%	-10.68%	17.12%
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF	35.78%	22.31%	5.14%	6.07%	44.12%	83.80%	-32.85%	13.73%	-32.71%	-4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between HAP and XEG.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2008	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between HAP and XEG.TO has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAP	XEG.TO
Basic Materials	38.6%	-
Energy	30.7%	100.0%
Industrials	10.1%	-
Utilities	9.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	-
Healthcare	2.8%	-
Technology	1.4%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	-

Return for Risk

HAP vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP

HAP Risk / Return Rank: 87
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

XEG.TO

XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAP	XEG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.20	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.72	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.35	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.74	5.17	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.71	12.56	+5.15

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAP and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -91.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and XEG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAP	XEG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-91.23%	+40.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-10.20%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-29.14%	+12.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	-33.93%	+8.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.07%	-81.25%	+37.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.42%	-9.41%	+4.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.07%	-43.49%	+31.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	4.19%	-1.97%

Volatility

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is 5.20%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that HAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAP	XEG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	8.99%	-3.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.86%	19.69%	-6.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	23.91%	-8.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	29.53%	-11.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.75%	34.27%	-14.52%

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAP vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than XEG.TO's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	1.91%	2.27%	2.65%	3.27%	3.28%	2.16%	2.45%	2.80%	2.85%	2.02%	1.99%	3.00%
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF	2.76%	3.63%	3.46%	4.26%	3.31%	1.64%	2.96%	2.70%	2.25%	1.41%	1.40%	3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAP and XEG.TO in my portfolio?

HAP and XEG.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HAP or XEG.TO?

On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAP or XEG.TO?

HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.

What is the main difference between HAP and XEG.TO?

HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.60% for XEG.TO.