HAP vs. REMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) and REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HAP returned 11.99%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for REMX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

HAP vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 33.01% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.

HAP

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 23.70%
• 1Y: 46.66%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

REMX

• 1D: -3.78%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 33.01%
• 6M: 37.14%
• 1Y: 172.35%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAP vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	21.49%	34.91%	-4.08%	2.46%	7.84%	25.04%	6.30%	18.60%	-10.68%	17.12%
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF	33.01%	92.95%	-35.02%	-19.18%	-31.13%	79.81%	64.82%	0.74%	-49.63%	82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HAP and REMX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010	0.65

The correlation between HAP and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAP vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAP	REMX
Basic Materials	36.7%	100.0%
Energy	32.3%	-
Industrials	10.2%	-
Utilities	9.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	-
Healthcare	2.8%	-
Technology	0.9%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	-

Return for Risk

HAP vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP

HAP Risk / Return Rank: 89
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAP vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAP	REMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	3.61	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	3.66	+0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.46	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.65	7.43	-1.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.05	21.32	+1.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAP vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAP and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAP	REMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	3.61	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.11	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.28	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	-0.08	+0.34

Drawdowns

HAP vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and REMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAP	REMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.73%	-90.20%	+39.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-23.35%	+15.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-62.11%	+45.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	-73.34%	+47.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.07%	-73.34%	+29.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-54.98%	+53.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-66.87%	+54.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	8.12%	-6.09%

Volatility

HAP vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is 4.37%, while VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that HAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAP	REMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	13.02%	-8.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.24%	34.77%	-22.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.91%	48.11%	-33.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.24%	40.24%	-22.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.74%	36.94%	-17.20%

HAP vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAP vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than REMX's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	1.87%	2.27%	2.65%	3.27%	3.28%	2.16%	2.45%	2.80%	2.85%	2.02%	1.99%	3.00%
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF	1.32%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAP and REMX in my portfolio?

HAP and REMX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAP or REMX?

REMX has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to HAP (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAP dropped -50.73% vs REMX's -90.20%.

Which ETF is better, HAP or REMX?

On 10-year performance, HAP leads with 11.99% vs 10.14% for REMX. On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAP or REMX?

Over the 10-year period, HAP has performed better with a 11.99% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAP or REMX?

HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAP or REMX?

HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.32% for REMX.

What is the main difference between HAP and REMX?

HAP is categorized as Energy Equities, while REMX is Materials. HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while REMX tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.59% for REMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 3.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.