HAP vs. PBOG
HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index while PBOG tracks the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
HAP vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 20.33% return.
HAP
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAP vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 13.98% | 5.66% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 20.33% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and PBOG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAP vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
HAP
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HAP vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAP | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.62 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAP vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAP | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -16.46% | -34.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -15.19% | +7.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -3.86% | -8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | — | — |
Volatility
HAP vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAP | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 23.95% | -8.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 23.95% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 23.95% | -4.26% |
HAP vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAP vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than PBOG's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAP and PBOG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.
HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.14% for PBOG.
HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for HAP and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer