PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAP vs. PBOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAP vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 32.22% return.


HAP

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.64%
YTD
21.49%
6M
23.70%
1Y
46.66%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.99%

PBOG

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
32.22%
6M
29.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAP vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HAP and PBOG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAP vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP
HAP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PBOG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAP vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAPPBOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.05

HAP vs. PBOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAPPBOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

3.31

-3.05

Drawdowns

HAP vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -11.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and PBOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAPPBOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-11.45%

-39.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-6.81%

+4.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-3.10%

-8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

Volatility

HAP vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAPPBOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

23.67%

-8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

23.67%

-5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

23.67%

-3.93%

HAP vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAP vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison

HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
1.87%2.27%2.65%3.27%3.28%2.16%2.45%2.80%2.85%2.02%1.99%3.00%
PBOG
Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF
0.13%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAP and PBOG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.

HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.

HAP is categorized as Energy Equities, while PBOG is Oil & Gas. HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.13% for PBOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAP and PBOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer