PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAMVX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAMVX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAMVX achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 9.39% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: HAMVX at 10.55% and VMFVX at 10.55%.


HAMVX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.32%
YTD
16.65%
6M
17.88%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
10.55%

VMFVX

1D
1.05%
1M
2.15%
YTD
9.39%
6M
9.65%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAMVX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
16.65%16.00%12.10%16.42%-5.63%29.93%-3.77%22.93%-17.82%12.01%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.39%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HAMVX and VMFVX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.96

The correlation between HAMVX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAMVX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAMVX
HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAMVX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAMVXVMFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.27

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

2.18

+3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.16

7.51

+11.65

HAMVX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAMVX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAMVXVMFVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.51

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.40

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.52

-0.12

Drawdowns

HAMVX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAMVX drawdown since its inception was -64.17%, which is greater than VMFVX's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAMVX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAMVXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.17%

-45.79%

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-10.52%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-22.46%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-22.46%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.44%

-45.79%

-5.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-5.48%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.05%

-1.12%

Volatility

HAMVX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) is 3.24%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that HAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAMVXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

4.02%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

10.50%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

15.14%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

19.47%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

21.88%

+0.02%

HAMVX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAMVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAMVX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

HAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than VMFVX's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
7.43%8.67%5.77%7.20%8.24%1.27%2.35%3.10%8.41%3.84%3.06%3.30%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.72%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, HAMVX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMFVX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to HAMVX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAMVX dropped -64.17% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAMVX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer