PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAMVX vs. NOIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAMVX vs. NOIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAMVX achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly higher than NOIEX's 11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, HAMVX has underperformed NOIEX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while NOIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.92% annualized return.


HAMVX

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.81%
YTD
16.29%
6M
17.55%
1Y
35.80%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
10.51%

NOIEX

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.15%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.02%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAMVX vs. NOIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
16.29%16.00%12.10%16.42%-5.63%29.93%-3.77%22.93%-17.82%12.01%
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
11.81%18.81%24.28%19.56%-13.34%27.96%11.03%27.04%-6.62%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between HAMVX and NOIEX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between HAMVX and NOIEX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAMVX vs. NOIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAMVX
HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NOIEX
NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAMVX vs. NOIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAMVXNOIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

3.61

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.17

16.44

+1.73

HAMVX vs. NOIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the NOIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAMVX and NOIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAMVXNOIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.57

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.85

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.78

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.69

-0.29

Drawdowns

HAMVX vs. NOIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAMVX drawdown since its inception was -64.17%, which is greater than NOIEX's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAMVX and NOIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAMVXNOIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.17%

-45.66%

-18.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-8.39%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-18.06%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-21.89%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.44%

-35.31%

-16.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.88%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-4.99%

-4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.83%

+0.10%

Volatility

HAMVX vs. NOIEX - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) at 2.83%. This indicates that HAMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAMVXNOIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

2.83%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

8.75%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

11.82%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

16.36%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

17.96%

+3.93%

HAMVX vs. NOIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAMVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NOIEX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAMVX vs. NOIEX - Dividend Comparison

HAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than NOIEX's 7.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
7.46%8.67%5.77%7.20%8.24%1.27%2.35%3.10%8.41%3.84%3.06%3.30%
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
7.21%7.92%6.11%7.03%5.44%14.26%7.67%8.58%15.73%7.56%3.02%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAMVX and NOIEX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAMVX has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to NOIEX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAMVX dropped -64.17% vs NOIEX's -45.66%.

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAMVX and NOIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer