PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAMVX vs. HACAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAMVX vs. HACAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAMVX achieves a 23.67% return, which is significantly higher than HACAX's 4.41% return. Over the past 10 years, HAMVX has underperformed HACAX with an annualized return of 11.00%, while HACAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.


HAMVX

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.19%
6M
16.15%
YTD
23.67%
1Y
40.57%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
8.90%

HACAX

1D
1.16%
1M
-0.47%
6M
6.49%
YTD
4.41%
1Y
10.64%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
18.27%
ALL TIME*
12.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HAMVX vs. HACAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
23.67%16.00%12.10%16.42%-5.63%29.93%-3.77%22.93%-17.82%12.01%
HACAX
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I
4.41%13.95%46.37%53.74%-37.72%15.32%54.69%33.42%-1.30%36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HAMVX and HACAX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2002

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between HAMVX and HACAX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAMVX vs. HACAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HAMVX
HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

HACAX
HACAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HAMVX vs. HACAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAMVXHACAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.09

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

0.47

+5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.43

1.37

+20.06

HAMVX vs. HACAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the HACAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAMVX and HACAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAMVX vs. HACAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAMVX drawdown since its inception was -64.17%, roughly equal to the maximum HACAX drawdown of -63.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAMVX and HACAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAMVXHACAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.17%

-63.05%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-17.96%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-27.37%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-43.52%

+22.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.44%

-43.52%

-7.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-5.38%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-16.17%

+6.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

6.10%

-4.28%

Volatility

HAMVX vs. HACAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) is 2.99%, while Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that HAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAMVXHACAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

5.07%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

14.00%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

17.85%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

25.96%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

24.42%

-2.62%

HAMVX vs. HACAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAMVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HACAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAMVX vs. HACAX - Dividend Comparison

HAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, less than HACAX's 10.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HACAX
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I
10.78%11.25%21.75%0.00%0.00%18.64%12.25%8.88%10.97%11.56%6.26%6.83%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
7.01%8.67%5.77%7.20%8.24%1.27%2.35%3.10%8.41%3.84%3.06%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAMVX and HACAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HACAX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to HAMVX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAMVX dropped -64.17% vs HACAX's -63.05%.

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAMVX and HACAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer