HAKY vs. SILJ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HAKY (Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAKY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. HAKY is actively managed, while SILJ is passively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAKY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.

Performance

HAKY vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF (HAKY) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HAKY

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 18.02%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILJ

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 17.56%
• 1Y: 109.13%
• 3Y*: 47.92%
• 5Y*: 13.22%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAKY vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HAKY Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF	23.43%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	-15.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HAKY and SILJ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.09

HAKY vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAKY	SILJ
Technology	91.2%	-
Industrials	8.8%	-
Financial Services	1.0%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	99.8%
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.2%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HAKY vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 55
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAKY vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF (HAKY) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAKY	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.52	0.09	+2.43

Drawdowns

HAKY vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAKY drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAKY and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAKY	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.12%	-79.04%	+65.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-26.50%	+23.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	-41.43%	+36.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HAKY	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.72%	54.90%	-24.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.72%	44.33%	-13.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.72%	46.23%	-15.51%

HAKY vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAKY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAKY vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

HAKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than SILJ's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAKY Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF	5.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.87%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAKY and SILJ in my portfolio?

HAKY and SILJ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HAKY or SILJ?

On fees, HAKY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAKY or SILJ?

HAKY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAKY or SILJ?

HAKY has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 1.87% for SILJ.

What is the main difference between HAKY and SILJ?

HAKY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SILJ is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HAKY and 0.69% for SILJ.