PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAINX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAINX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Fund (HAINX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAINX achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than RWIIX's 7.48% return.


HAINX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.73%
YTD
6.22%
6M
5.87%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
8.21%

RWIIX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.64%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAINX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAINX
Harbor International Fund
6.22%28.41%4.21%16.16%-13.80%9.50%11.09%22.57%-18.29%0.06%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
7.48%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HAINX and RWIIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017

0.60

The correlation between HAINX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAINX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAINX
HAINX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
HAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAINX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Fund (HAINX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAINXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.93

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

7.65

-2.70

HAINX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAINX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAINX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAINX drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAINX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAINXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.21%

-20.34%

-39.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-6.94%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.08%

-20.34%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.14%

-20.34%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-2.38%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-7.78%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

2.65%

+0.92%

Volatility

HAINX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Fund (HAINX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAINXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.12%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

9.08%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

11.52%

+3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

11.63%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

10.95%

+5.65%

HAINX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAINX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAINX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

HAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than RWIIX's 8.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAINX
Harbor International Fund
3.36%3.57%3.86%3.55%3.32%2.15%1.05%3.12%64.33%6.28%0.17%4.80%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.13%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAINX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAINX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to RWIIX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAINX dropped -60.21% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAINX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer