HAINX vs. RPMGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor International Fund (HAINX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX).
HAINX is managed by Harbor. It was launched on Dec 29, 1987. RPMGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1992.
Performance
HAINX vs. RPMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HAINX vs. RPMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAINX Harbor International Fund | -1.00% | 28.41% | 4.21% | 16.16% | -13.80% | 9.50% | 11.09% | 22.57% | -18.29% | 22.99% |
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -4.07% | 10.55% | 21.08% | 20.27% | -22.51% | 14.94% | 24.16% | 31.53% | -2.12% | 24.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAINX achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly higher than RPMGX's -4.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HAINX has underperformed RPMGX with an annualized return of 6.98%, while RPMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.
HAINX
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 18.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
RPMGX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAINX vs. RPMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAINX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than RPMGX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HAINX vs. RPMGX — Risk / Return Rank
HAINX
RPMGX
HAINX vs. RPMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Fund (HAINX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAINX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 0.72 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.20 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.16 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.13 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 4.47 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAINX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 0.72 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.29 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.59 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.67 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between HAINX and RPMGX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HAINX vs. RPMGX - Dividend Comparison
HAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than RPMGX's 13.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAINX Harbor International Fund | 3.60% | 3.57% | 3.86% | 3.55% | 3.32% | 2.15% | 1.05% | 3.12% | 64.33% | 6.28% | 0.17% | 4.80% |
RPMGX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 13.24% | 12.70% | 20.43% | 6.35% | 2.60% | 10.52% | 4.53% | 5.29% | 12.12% | 8.04% | 3.45% | 9.51% |
Drawdowns
HAINX vs. RPMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAINX drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, which is greater than RPMGX's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAINX and RPMGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAINX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.21% | -54.66% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -12.47% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.14% | -32.08% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.75% | -35.96% | -3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.12% | -7.71% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -6.99% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.16% | +0.02% |
Volatility
HAINX vs. RPMGX - Volatility Comparison
Harbor International Fund (HAINX) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) at 5.75%. This indicates that HAINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HAINX | RPMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 5.75% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 11.80% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 19.72% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 19.27% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 19.06% | -2.48% |