HAINX vs. RPMGX

In the year-to-date period, HAINX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than RPMGX's -8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, HAINX has underperformed RPMGX with an annualized return of -1.54%, while RPMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.36% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HAINX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than RPMGX's 0.72% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Fund (HAINX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HAINX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the RPMGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAINX and RPMGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, while RPMGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum HAINX drawdown since its inception was -62.61%, which is greater than RPMGX's maximum drawdown of -58.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAINX and RPMGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Harbor International Fund (HAINX) is 10.80%, while T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that HAINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.